[1]严圣艳,侯伶.采用两阶段超效率SBM-DEA模型的创新型省份创新效率评价[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2025,(2):230-236.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202404040]
　YAN Shengyan,HOU Ling.Evaluation of Innovation Efficiency of Innovative Provinces Using Two-Stage Super-Efficiency SBM-DEA Model[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2025,(2):230-236.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202404040]
点击复制

采用两阶段超效率SBM-DEA模型的创新型省份创新效率评价()
分享到：

《华侨大学学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1000-5013/CN:35-1079/N]

卷:
期数:
2025年第2期
页码:
230-236
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation of Innovation Efficiency of Innovative Provinces Using Two-Stage Super-Efficiency SBM-DEA Model
文章编号:
1000-5013(2025)02-0230-07
作者:
严圣艳;  侯伶
华侨大学 经济与金融学院, 福建 泉州 362021
Author(s):
YAN Shengyan;  HOU Ling
School of Economics and Finance, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China
关键词:
创新型省份;  创新效率;  两阶段超效率SBM-DEA模型;  Malmquist指数
Keywords:
innovative province;  innovation efficiency;  two-stage super-efficiency SBM-DEA model;  Malmquist index
分类号:
F124.3
DOI:
10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202404040
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用两阶段超效率SBM-DEA模型,对10个主要创新型省份2015-2022年的创新效率进行测度,借助Malmquist指数法和耦合协调度模型分析各省创新效率的动态趋势和两阶段创新效率的协调性。根据两阶段效率特征和分布特点,探讨各类省份的效率增长路径。结果表明:广东省、江苏省和福建省的两阶段创新效率和整体创新效率均达到DEA有效;多数创新型省份的商业转化阶段创新效率高于技术研发阶段创新效率,但各创新型省份商业转化阶段的TFP低于技术研发阶段的TFP;各创新型省份两阶段发展协调性总体较差,多数省份效率提升路径偏向于技术研发效率增长。
Abstract:
Using a two-stage super-efficiency SBM-DEA model, the innovation efficiency of ten major innovative provinces from 2015 to 2022 is measured, the Malmquist index method and coupling coordination degree model are used to analyze the dynamic trend of innovation efficiency and the coordination of two-stage innovation efficiency in each province, and to explore the efficiency growth paths of various provinces based on two-stage efficiency characteristics and distribution characteristics. The results show that Guangdong Province, Jiangsu Province and Fujian Province had achieved DEA efficiency in both two-stage innovation efficiency and overall innovation efficiency, the innovation efficiency in the commercial transformation stage of most innovative provinces was higher than that in the technology research and development stage, but the TFP in the commercial transformation stage of each innovative province was lower than that in the technology research and development stage, the overall development coordination of the two-stage of each innovative province was relatively poor, and the efficiency improvement paths of most provinces tended to focus on the increase of technology research and development efficiency.

参考文献/References:

[1] 曹希广,邓敏,刘乃全.通往创新之路: 国家创新型城市建设能否促进中国企业创新[J].世界经济,2022,45(6):159-184.DOI:10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2022.06.005.
[2] 武力超.创新型试点城市的技术创新绩效综合评估[J].经济体制改革,2022(5):43-50.
[3] 赵城,苏婧.创新政策能否提升能源效率?: 来自国家创新型城市试点的经验证据[J].产业经济研究,2024(1):1-15.DOI:10.13269/j.cnki.ier.2024.01.008.
[4] SEONGMIN S,WIEMER C.The impact of the innovation city project on the local economy: Evidence from Korean Innovation City Project from 2012 to 2014[J].Journal of Asian Economics,2024,90:101677.
[5] 严圣艳,朱凯.创新型省份试点政策对我国产业升级的影响[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023(4):71-82.DOI:10.16067/j.cnki.35-1049/c.20230703.001.
[6] 王默,魏先彪,彭小宝,等.国家创新型城市效率评价研究: 基于两阶段DEA模型[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018,20(6):65-74.DOI:10.15918/j.jbitss1009-3370.2018.2917.
[7] 徐小阳,赵喜仓.创新型省份建设绩效评价及其影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2012(24):70-73.
[8] 陈锦其,周学武,潘家栋.浙江高水平创新型省份建设的进程评价: 基于县市TFP与创新集聚效应的实证分析[J].治理研究,2020,36(5):88-95.DOI:10.15944/j.cnki.33-1010/d.2020.05.010.
[9] 尹凡,单莹洁,苏传华,等.河北省区域创新绩效评价模型的构建[J].统计与决策,2011(14):77-79.
[10] 程大友,冯英浚.基于两阶段关联DEA模型的企业效率研究: 以财产保险公司为例[J].预测,2008(3):55-61.
[11] 杨力,魏奇锋.基于超效率DEA与Malmquist指数的区域研发效率评价: 四大国家级城市群比较研究[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(10):41-51.
[12] 谭涛,李俊龙.我国高校科技成果转化与区域高技术产业发展水平测度以及耦合协调度研究[J].中国科学基金,2023,37(4):682-691.DOI:10.16262/j.cnki.1000-8217.20230512.001.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2024-04-18
通信作者: 严圣艳(1985-),女,副教授,博士,主要从事创新经济学的研究。E-mail:151408030@qq.com。
基金项目: 福建省社科规划重点项目(FJ2022A012); 福建省创新战略研究项目(2020R0057); 华侨大学高层次人才科研启动项目(21SKBS011)
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-03-20