[1]徐涵,欧达毅,杜春雨,等.海上栈道的日夜视听景观评价与对比分析[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2022,43(6):736-742.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202111015]
　XU Han,OU Dayi,DU Chunyu,et al.Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Day-Night Audio-Visual Landscape of Sea Plank Road[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2022,43(6):736-742.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202111015]
点击复制

海上栈道的日夜视听景观评价与对比分析()
分享到：

《华侨大学学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1000-5013/CN:35-1079/N]

卷:
第43卷
期数:
2022年第6期
页码:
736-742
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-11-11

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Day-Night Audio-Visual Landscape of Sea Plank Road
文章编号:
1000-5013(2022)06-0736-07
作者:
徐涵1;  欧达毅1; 2;  杜春雨1;  廉英奇1
1. 华侨大学 建筑学院, 福建 厦门 361021;2. 华南理工大学 亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室, 广东 广州 510640
Author(s):
XU Han1;  OU Dayi1; 2;  DU Chunyu1;  LIAN Yingqi1
1. School of Architecture, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
关键词:
声景观;  视听景观;  日夜对比;  海上栈道;  声漫步
Keywords:
soundscape;  audio-visual landscape;  day and night contrast;  sea plank road;  soundwalk
分类号:
TU112
DOI:
10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202111015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在日夜不同时段,对厦门市集美区海上栈道的视听景观质量进行评价与对比分析,深入讨论日夜差异对海上栈道总体环境、视听元素及感知评价的影响.结果表明:海上栈道在日夜客观声压级及温度、湿度差异不大的情况下,总体环境及视、听元素的声景满意度、视景优美度等指标的日夜主观评价结果呈显著差异;协调度是影响海上栈道视听景观质量的重要因素;栈道日夜感知评价存在显著差异,日间评价结果优于夜间.
Abstract:
At different times of day and night, the audio-visual landscape quality of the sea plank road in Jimei District, Xiamen City is evaluated and comparatively analyzed, the influences of day and night differences on the overall environment, audio-visual elements and perception evaluation of the sea plank road are discussed. The results show: for a little difference of objective sound pressure level, temperature and humidity between day and night on sea plank road, the subjective evaluation results of indicators such as soundscape satisfaction and visual beauty of the overall environment and audio-visual elements show significant differences. Coordination is an important factor affecting the quality of the audio-visual landscape of the sea plank road. There is a significant difference in perception evaluation of the plank road between day and night, and daytime evaluation results are better than nighttime results.

参考文献/References:

[1] FAN Qindong,HE Yujie,HU Li.Soundscape evaluation and construction strategy of park road[J].Applied Acoustics,2021,174:107685.DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107685.
[2] 陈杰,王波,李立新,等.城市健康步道声景优化研究: 以厦门山海健康步道狐尾山段为例[J].城市建筑,2021,18(10):32-37.DOI:10.19892/j.cnki.csjz.2021.10.07.
[3] 张旭,陈璟璇,林钦熙,等.基于扎根理论的城市休闲步道声景评价研究: 以福州福道为例[J].建筑与文化,2019(11):88-90.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4909.2019.11.029.
[4] BJERRE L C,LARSEN T M,S?RENSEN A J,et al.On-site and laboratory evaluations of soundscape quality in recreational urban spaces[J].Noise and Health,2017,19(89):183-192.DOI:10.4103/nah.NAH_109_16.
[5] TARLAO C,STEELE D,GUASTAVINO C.Investigating factors influencing soundscape evaluations across multiple urban spaces in Montreal[C]//Conference Proceedings of INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress.Madrid:Institute of Noise Control Engineering,2019:6888-6899.
[6] 廉英奇,欧达毅,潘森森,等.不同景观空间类型的声景评价研究[J].建筑科学,2020,36(8):57-63.DOI:10.13614/j.cnki.11-1962/tu.2020.08.09.
[7] 车明静.烟台滨海步道景观设计的研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2013.
[8] 陈佳欣,马煜箫,朱玉蓉.生命周期视角下的城市滨水生态景观设计研究: 以武汉东湖凌波门栈道为例[C]//中国风景园林学会2020年会论文集(下册).成都:中国建筑工业出版社,2020:88-94.DOI:10.26914/c.cnkihy.2020.056819.
[9] KABILAN T,MOHAN A,JAYACHANDRAN K,et al.Soundscape study of urban public spaces along the sea shore[C]//Conference Proceedings of INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress.Melbourne:Institute of Noise Control Engineering,2014:5108-5117.
[10] 庞弘,何谋.声景的研究与进展[J].风景园林,2016(5):88-97.DOI:10.14085/j.fjyl.2016.05.0088.10.
[11] JEON J Y,HONG J Y,LEE P J.Soundwalk approach to identifyurban soundscapes individually[J].The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,2013,134(1):803.DOI:10.1121/1.4807801.
[12] 庄惟敏.SD法与建筑空间环境评价[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),1996,36(4):42-47.DOI:10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.1996.04.009.
[13] DAVIES W J,BRUCE N S,MURPHY J E.Soundscape reproduction and synthesis[J].Acta Acustica United with Acustica,2014,100(2):285-292.DOI:10.3813/AAA.918708.
[14] 胡兴,李保峰,陈宏.室外热舒适度研究综述与评估框架[J].建筑科学,2020,36(4):53-61.DOI:10.13614/j.cnki.11-1962/tu.2020.04.09.
[15] 中国环境科学研究院.声环境功能区划分技术规范: GB/T 15190-2014[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2014.
[16] 中国环境科学研究院.声环境质量标准: GB 3096-2008[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2008.
[17] OU Dayi,MAK C M,PAN Sensen.A method for assessing soundscape in urban parks based on the service quality measurement models[J].Applied Acoustics,2017,127:184-193.DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.06.006.

相似文献/References:

[1]艾祥睿,欧达毅.声压级大小对鸟叫声和流水声恢复性效应的影响[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2022,43(5):612.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202104054]
　AI Xiangrui,OU Dayi.Influence of Sound Pressure Level on Recovery Effect of Bird Sound and Water Sound[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2022,43(6):612.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202104054]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2021-11-10
通信作者: 欧达毅(1982-),男,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事建筑(城市)声环境、声景观的研究.E-mail:oudayi_hqu@126.com.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51578252); 福建省社会科学规划项目(FJ2021B075); 福建省大学生创新创业训练项目(S202010385027); 华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室开放研究项目(2022ZA02)http://www.hdxb.hqu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-11-20