[1]杨志林,罗漪,王海峰.圆形福建土楼模态分析[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2021,42(1):30-37.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202004034]
　YANG Zhilin,LUO Yi,WANG Haifeng.Modal Analysis of Circular Fujian Tulou[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2021,42(1):30-37.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202004034]
点击复制

圆形福建土楼模态分析()
分享到：

《华侨大学学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1000-5013/CN:35-1079/N]

卷:
第42卷
期数:
2021年第1期
页码:
30-37
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Modal Analysis of Circular Fujian Tulou
文章编号:
1000-5013(2021)01-0030-08
作者:
杨志林;  罗漪;  王海峰
华侨大学 土木工程学院, 福建 厦门 361021
Author(s):
YANG Zhilin;  LUO Yi;  WANG Haifeng
College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361012, China
关键词:
福建土楼;  客家土楼;  夯土结构;  自振频率;  动力特性
Keywords:
Fujian Tulou;  Hakka Tulou;  rammed earth structure;  natural frequency;  dynamic characteristics
分类号:
TU361
DOI:
10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202004034
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了研究福建土楼的动力特性,运用有限元数值模拟方法,将土楼简化为外部夯土结构、夯土-木构混合结构两种模型,并对模型进行模态分析;研究夯土弹性模量、夯土密度、夯土墙高度、土楼结构平均半径及夯土墙平均厚度等5个因素对土楼外部夯土结构自振频率的影响.结果表明:夯土结构自振频率随着夯土弹性模量、夯土墙平均厚度的增加而增加,随着夯土密度、夯土墙高度、土楼结构平均半径的增加而减小;夯土结构自振频率与夯土弹性模量的平方根近似成正比,与夯土密度的平方根及夯土墙高度近似成反比;不同阶自振频率曲线发生重合现象,说明圆形土楼夯土结构可能存在密频现象,也说明材料特性变化对不同阶自振频率的影响基本一致;土楼结构平均半径和夯土的弹性模量的参数敏感性最大,夯土密度的参数敏感性较小.
Abstract:
Tulou was simplified into two models including external rammed earth structure and rammed earth-timber mixed structure, the finite element simulation method was used to analyze the dynamic modal characteristics of Fujian Tulou models. The influence on natural frequency of external rammed earth structure was studied by 5 factors including the elastic modulus, density of rammed earth, the height, the average radius of structure of Tulou, and the average thickness of the rammed earth wall. The results show that the natural frequency of the structure increases with the increase of the elastic modulus of rammed earth and the thickness of the rammed earth wall, decreases with the increase of the density of rammed earth, height of Tulou, and average radius of structure of Tulou. The natural frequency of rammed earth is approximately proportional to the square root of the elastic modulus of rammed earth, and is inversely proportional to the square root of the density of rammed earth and the height of Tulou. The natural frequency curves of different orders coincide, indicating that there may be dense frequency phenomena in the rammed earth structure of circular Tulou, and the influence of the change of material properties on natural frequencies of different orders was similar. The parameters of the average radius and elastic modulus of rammed earth are the most sensitive, the parameter of rammed earth density is little sensitive.

参考文献/References:

[1] 黄汉民,陈立慕.福建土楼建筑[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社,2012.
[2] ZHOU Tiegang,LIU Bo.Experimental study on the shaking table tests of a modern inner-reinforced rammed earth structure[J].Construction and Building Materials,2019,203:567-578.DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.070.
[3] 宋崇阳.生土结构农房抗震试验研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2011.
[4] 吴英.新疆木构架土坯墙结构房屋抗震性能试验研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2008.
[5] DELGADILLO R,GIACOMO Z,RUBEN B,et al.Study of the environmental influence on the dynamic behavior of adobe walls: Preliminary test in laboratory specimens[C]//International Conference on Experimental Vibration Analysis for Civil Engineering Structures.[S.l.]:Springer,2017:758-769.DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-67443-8_67.
[6] BARROS R,HUGO R,VARUM H,et al.Seismic analysis of a portuguese vernacular building[J].Journal of Architectural Engineering,2017,24(1):05017010.1-05017010.11.DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000258.
[7] 徐颖.新型夯土房屋材料基本力学性能试验与结构性能分析[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2012.
[8] GOMES M I,MARIO L,de BRITO J.Seismic resistance of earth construction in Portugal[J].Engineering Structures,2011,33(3):932-941.DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.014.
[9] BUI Q B,HANS S,MOREL J C,et al.First exploratory study on dynamic characteristics of rammed earth buildings[J].Engineering Structures,2011,33(12):3690-3695.DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.004.
[10] European Commitee for Standardization.Design of structures for earthquake resistance: part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings: EN 1998-1: 2004[S].London:[s.n.],2004.
[11] 李衡.土楼的土与木组合结构抗震性能研究[D].厦门:华侨大学,2017.
[12] 王安宁.福建土楼夯土结构抗震性能的数值研究[D].厦门:华侨大学,2015.
[13] 何明明.土楼的土木结构协同机理与整体承载性能研究[D].厦门:华侨大学,2019.
[14] 叶俊捷,彭兴黔,施维娟.圆形土楼夯土结构性能的数值模拟[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2016,37(6):698-701.DOI:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.201606008.
[15] 丁楠.福建土楼木梁-夯土墙界面性能研究[D].厦门:华侨大学,2018.
[16] 栾力文.传统木结构节点区摩擦耗能机理及力学模型化有限元研究[D].昆明:昆明理工大学,2014.
[17] SILVA R A,NUNO M,OLIVEIRA D V,et al.Evaluating the seismic behaviour of rammed earth buildings from Portugal: From simple tools to advanced approaches[J].Engineering Structures,2018,157:144-156.DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.021.
[18] 邢誉峰,刘波.板壳自由振动的精确解[M].北京:科学出版社,2015.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈雪琦,罗漪,胡红松,等.福建土楼混合结构抗震性能的数值模拟分析[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2021,42(2):165.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202006044]
　CHEN Xueqi,LUO Yi,HU Hongsong,et al.Numerical Simulation Analysis on Seismic Performance of Fujian Tulou Mixed Structure[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2021,42(1):165.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202006044]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2020-04-29
通信作者: 罗漪(1976-),女,副教授,博士,主要从事福建土楼的研究.E-mail:luoyi@hqu.edu.cn.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51878302, 52078225)
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-01-20