[1]蔡敏伟,王卫华,董毓利,等.再生块体混凝土的单轴受压试验[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2020,41(1):19-25.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.201905003]
　CAI Minwei,WANG Weihua,DONG Yuli,et al.Experiment on Uniaxial Compression of Compound ConcreteMade of Demolished Concrete Lumps and Fresh Concrete[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2020,41(1):19-25.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.201905003]
点击复制

再生块体混凝土的单轴受压试验()
分享到：

《华侨大学学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1000-5013/CN:35-1079/N]

卷:
第41卷
期数:
2020年第1期
页码:
19-25
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Experiment on Uniaxial Compression of Compound ConcreteMade of Demolished Concrete Lumps and Fresh Concrete
文章编号:
1000-5013(2020)01-0019-07
作者:
蔡敏伟1; 2;  王卫华1; 2;  董毓利1; 2;  洪铁东1;  陈香蓉1;  郭秀泉1
1. 华侨大学 土木工程学院, 福建 厦门 361021;2. 华侨大学 厦门市抗火综合防灾工程技术研究中心, 福建 厦门 361021
Author(s):
CAI Minwei1; 2;  WANG Weihua1; 2;  DONG Yuli1; 2; HONG Tiedong1;  CHEN Xiangrong1;  GUO Xiuquan1
1. College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China; 2. Xiamen Engineering Research Center for Fire Resistance and Disaster Prevention, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China
关键词:
再生块体混凝土;  抗压强度;  取代率;  弹性模量;  峰值应变;  泊松比
Keywords:
compound concrete made of demolished concrete lumps and fresh concrete;  compressive strength;  replacement ratio;  elastic modulus;  peak strain;  Poisson’s ratio
分类号:
TU375.2
DOI:
10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.201905003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
首先,将抗压强度分别为26.7,45.0,87.6 MPa的3种旧混凝土块体与普通商品混凝土进行混合浇筑,制作18个再生块体混凝土立方体试件和18个棱柱体试件.然后,进行立方体试件和棱柱体试件的单轴受压试验,研究旧混凝土的取代率及新旧混凝土的抗压强度差对再生块体混凝土受压力学性能的影响.结果表明:在添加低抗压强度(26.7,45.0 MPa)旧混凝土的试件中,新旧混凝土结合良好,界面难以辨别;在添加较高抗压强度(87.6 MPa)旧混凝土的棱柱体试件中,新旧混凝土的结合界面出现分离现象;试件的破坏形态似2个对顶的角锥形状;在新旧混凝土抗压强度差不变的情况下,再生块体混凝土的抗压强度、弹性模量、峰值应变随旧混凝土取代率的增加而降低,取代率对抗压强度影响较大,但对弹性模量、峰值应变的影响较小;在新旧混凝土抗压强度差不同、取代率相同的情况下,随着旧混凝土块体抗压强度的增大,再生块体混凝土的抗压强度、弹性模量、峰值应变均呈一定的上升趋势;再生块体混凝土的泊松比变化不明显,平均值约为0.212.
Abstract:
Three kinds of demolished concrete lumps(DCLs compressive strengths=26.7, 45.0, 87.6 MPa)were mixed with ordinary commercial concrete to cast 18 cube specimens and 18 prism specimens that both consist of compound concrete made of DCLs and fresh concrete. The uniaxial compression tests of cube and prism specimens were carried out, and the influence of the replacement ratio of DCLs and the strength difference between the new and demolished concrete on the specimen’s compressive behaviors was investigated. The results show that referring to the specimens with old concrete of low compressive strength(26.7, 45.0 MPa), the old and new concrete are well combined and the interfaces are difficult to distinguish; but prism specimens with old concrete of high compressive strength(87.6 MPa), show a phenomena of separation of bonding interface between new and old concrete; the specimen’s failure shape is similar to two pyramid shapes on the top; under the condition of constant difference of compressive strength between new and old concrete, the compre- ssive strength, elastic modulus and peak strain of the compound concrete decrease with the increase of the replacement ratio of the old concrete, and the influence of the replacement ratio on the compressive strength is more significant than that on the elastic modules and peak strain; under constant replacement ratio but different compressive strength of the new and old concrete, the increase of the strength of demolished concrete lumps increases the compressive strength, elastic modules and the peak strain; the Poisson’s ratio of the specimens varies little, ≈0.212.

参考文献/References:

[1] 朱红兵,王顺林,熊汉林,等.混凝土废弃物的再生利用[J].公路交通技术,2005(1):52-53.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6477.2005.01.016.
[2] 肖建庄.再生混凝土[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
[3] 肖建庄,杜江涛.不同再生粗集料混凝土单轴受压应力-应变全曲线[J].建筑材料学报,2008,11(1):111-115.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2008.01.021.
[4] 肖建庄.再生混凝土单轴受压应力-应变全曲线试验研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(11):1445-1449.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2008.01.021.
[5] 陈宗平,徐金俊,郑华海,等.再生混凝土基本力学性能试验及应力-应变本构关系[J].建筑材料学报,2013,16(1):24-32.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2013.01.005.
[6] 陈宗平,陈宇良,姚侃.再生混凝土三轴受压力学性能试验及其影响因素[J].建筑结构学报,2014,35(12):72-81.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2014.12.010.
[7] 吴波,刘琼祥,刘伟,等.钢管再生混合构件初探[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2008,30(4):120-124.
[8] 广东省住房和城乡建设厅.再生块体混凝土组合结构技术规程: DBJ/T 15-113-2016[S].北京:中国城市出版社,2016.
[9] 吴波,赵新宇,张金锁.薄壁圆钢管再生混合柱的抗震性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2012,45(11):1-12.
[10] 吴波,计明明.薄壁U形外包钢再生混合梁受弯性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2014,35(4):246-254.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2014.04.032.
[11] 吴波,骆志成.压型钢板再生混合混凝土组合楼板受力性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2016,37(5):29-38.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2016.05.004.
[12] 张金锁.薄壁方钢管再生混合柱的轴压和抗震性能试验研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2011.
[13] WU Bo,ZHANG Shuyi,YANG Yong.Compressive behaviors of cubes and cylinders made of normal-strength demolished concrete blocks and high-strength fresh concrete[J].Construction and Building Materials,2015,78:342-353.
[14] 吴波,刘璐,赵霄龙.自密实再生混合混凝土的单轴受压试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2016,37(增刊2):73-78,126.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2016.S2.011.
[15] 刘春晖.再生混合混凝土的受压尺寸效应及外置薄钢板再生混合墙的抗震性能研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2013.
[16] AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS.Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens: ASTM C39/C39M-17b[S].Philadelphia:ASTM International,2012.
[17] 张舒怡.再生混合混凝土高强化效应的初步试验研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2014.
[18] 中华人民共和国国家经济贸易委员会.水工混凝土试验规程: DL/T 5150-2001[S].北京:中国电力出版社,2002.
[19] 龚继豪,刘春晖,吕克文.形状和取代率对再生混合混凝土抗压性能的影响[J].混凝土,2017(4):99-103.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3550.2017.04.024.
[20] 中华人民共和国城乡与住房建设部.混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.

相似文献/References:

[1]严捍东.粉煤灰掺量与砂浆强度和水化参量的关系[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2001,22(3):278.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5013.2001.03.013]
　Yan Handong.Relation of Fly Ash Entrainment in the Mortar with Strength and Hydration Parameters of the Mortar[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2001,22(1):278.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5013.2001.03.013]
[2]陈莹,曾志兴.钢纤维轻骨料混凝土的强度和变形性能[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2003,24(4):380.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5013.2003.04.009]
　Chen Ying,Zeng Zhixing.Strength and Deformation as Mechanical Performance of Steel Fiber Light Aggregate Concrete[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2003,24(1):380.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5013.2003.04.009]
[3]严捍东.低温烧成阿利尼特白水泥的试验[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(1):110.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5013.2005.01.028]
　Yan Handong.A Trial of Calcining Alinite White Cement at Low Temperature[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2005,26(1):110.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5013.2005.01.028]
[4]黄奕辉,王全凤,罗才松,等.钢纤维混凝土的超声测强试验[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(4):373.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5013.2005.04.011]
　Huang Yihui,Wang Quanfeng,Luo Caisong,et al.Ultrasonic Strength Test on Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2005,26(1):373.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5013.2005.04.011]
[5]林超,郭子雄,黄群贤,等.不同新型墙材砌体的力学性能对比分析[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2012,33(5):552.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.2012.05.0552]
　LIN Chao,GUO Zi-xiong,HUANG Qun-xian,et al.Comparison of Mechanical Behaviors Among Various New Masonries for Wall[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2012,33(1):552.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.2012.05.0552]
[6]张美琴,高振,吴海融,等.花岗石锯切过程声发射信号特征的实验[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2015,36(6):615.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.2015.06.0615]
　ZHANG Meiqin,GAO Zhen,WU Hairong,et al.Experiment on the Characteristic of Acoustic Emission in Circular Sawing of Granite[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2015,36(1):615.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.2015.06.0615]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2019-05-06
通信作者: 王卫华(1980-),男,副教授,博士,主要从事组合结构与抗火性能的研究.E-mail:whwang@hqu.edu.cn.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51208217); 福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2014J01195); 福建省泉州市科技计划项目(2017T002); 华侨大学研究生科研创新能力培育计划资助项目(17013086004)http://www.hdxb.hqu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-01-20