[1]林逸珊,杨鸿辉,陈铮衍,等.游径感知视角下传统村落文旅空间景观质量分析[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2024,45(3):370-382.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202309016]
 LIN Yishan,YANG Honghui,CHEN Zhengyan,et al.Analysis on Landscape Quality of Cultural Tourism Space in Traditional Villages Under Trail Perception Perspective[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2024,45(3):370-382.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202309016]
点击复制

游径感知视角下传统村落文旅空间景观质量分析()
分享到:

《华侨大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-5013/CN:35-1079/N]

卷:
第45卷
期数:
2024年第3期
页码:
370-382
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on Landscape Quality of Cultural Tourism Space in Traditional Villages Under Trail Perception Perspective
文章编号:
1000-5013(2024)03-0370-13
作者:
林逸珊 杨鸿辉 陈铮衍 丁铮
福建农林大学 风景园林与艺术学院, 福建 福州 350100
Author(s):
LIN Yishan YANG Honghui CHEN Zhengyan DING Zheng
School of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350100, China
关键词:
乡村文旅空间 游径感知视角 景观质量评价 图像语义分割 美景度评价法 梧林传统古村落
Keywords:
rural cultural tourism space trail perception perspective landscape quality evaluation image semantic segmentation scenic beauty evaluation method Wulin traditional ancient villages
分类号:
TU986
DOI:
10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202309016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于游径感知视角,以泉州市梧林传统古村落为例,通过灰色统计分析法对乡村景观要素进行初步排除,结合图像语义分割技术将景观要素定量分析,构建美景度多元线性回归模型,研究梧林传统古村落景观质量评价。结果表明:天空开阔度、土壤裸露度、传统乡村建筑占比、乡村传统建筑色彩占比、村落景观道路占比、绿视率、铺装占比这7个景观要素与梧林传统古村落景观美景度显著相关;美景度模型结果显示具有高贡献率的3个主要因子依次是天空开阔度(0.387)、土壤裸露度(0.235)、传统乡村建筑占比(0.233);高美景度评价场景特征要素占比为天空开阔度26%~50%、土壤裸露度2%~5%、传统乡村建筑10%~30%;低美景度评价场景最突出特征为植被种类单一、道路设施风格与周围景观不协调、空间尺度感过大的景观空间;梧林传统古村落文旅空间景观质量存在空间分异性,主要受到空间要素、自然要素、建筑要素的共同影响。
Abstract:
Based on trail perception perspective, taking Wulin traditional ancient villages in Quanzhou City as an example, the grey statistical analysis method is used to preliminarily exclude rural landscape elements, and combined with image semantic segmentation technology, the landscape elements are quantitatively analyzed and a multiple linear regression model for scenic beauty is constructed to study the landscape quality evaluation of Wulin traditional ancient villages. The results show that seven landscape elements, including sky width, soil exposure, proportion of traditional rural buildings, proportion of traditional rural building colors, proportion of village landscape roads, green visibility rate, and proportion of pavement, are significantly correlated with the scenic beauty of Wulin traditional ancient villages. The results of scenic beauty model show that the three main factors with high contribution rates are sky width(0.387), soil exposure(0.235), and the proportion of traditional rural buildings(0.233). The proportion of scene feature elements in high scenic beauty evaluation is 26%-50% of sky width, 2%-5% of soil exposure, and 10%-30% of traditional rural buildings. The most prominent characteristics of low scenic beauty evaluation are a single type of vegetation, a road facility style that is not coordinated with the surrounding landscape, and a landscape space with excessive spatial scale sense. The landscape quality of cultural tourism space in Wulin traditional ancient villages has spatial differentiation, mainly influenced by the combined effects of spatial elements, natural elements, and architectural elements.

参考文献/References:

[1] 郭苏明,冯美玲.基于游客感知的乡村景观评价因子分析: 以苏州市树山村为例[J].西北林学院学报,2022,37(1):253-258.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2022.01.38.
[2] 李渊,黄竞雄,李莹.海岛旅游地国土空间开发适宜性评价与优化策略: 以普陀山为例[J].城市建筑,2021,18(4):39-44.DOI:10.19892/j.cnki.csjz.2021.04.09.
[3] 何疏悦,程敏,石依卉,等.游径视角下国家公园的空间表征: 以美国国家公园为例[J].中国园林,2023,39(3):53-59.DOI:10.19775/j.cla.2023.03.0053.
[4] 张琳,杨珂,刘滨谊,等.基于游客和居民不同视角的江南古镇景观地域特征感知研究: 以同里古镇为例[J].中国园林,2019,35(1):10-16.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2019.01.003.
[5] 丛昕,殷敏,丁绍刚,等.游客视角的中国古典园林景点热度感知评价与传播途径研究: 以苏州古典园林留园为例[J].中国园林,2021,37(8):56-61.DOI:10.19775/j.cla.2021.08.0056.
[6] 李鑫,吴丹子,李倞,等.基于深度学习的城市滨河绿道景观视觉感知评价研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2021,43(12):93-104.DOI:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210175.
[7] 黄竞雄,梁嘉祺,杨盟盛,等.基于街景图像的旅游地街道空间视觉品质评价方法[J/OL].地球信息科学学报(2022-12-23)[2023-09-19] .http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5809.p.20221219.0958.002.html.
[8] 陈洁菡,郎富平,沈实现.旅游开发视角下乡村景观营建对策研究[J].浙江树人大学学报(自然科学版),2018(3):40-45.
[9] 张军以,周奉,王腊春.乡村旅游视野下乡土景观的界定、保护与发展问题辨析[J].资源开发与市场,2018(10):1462-1465.
[10] 王秋鸟,邓华峰.基于AVC的乡村景观综合评价研究: 以三岔村为例[J].西北林学院学报,2016,31(3):298-303.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.03.52.
[11] KESHTKAR M,MOBARGHAEE N,SAYAYAHNIA R,et al.Landscape ecological security response to urban growth in Southern Zagros biome, Iran[J].Ecological Indicators,2023,154:110577.DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110577.
[12] PEARSON D M,GORMAN J T.Exploring the relevance of a landscape ecological paradigm for sustainable landscapes and livelihoods: A case-application from the Northern Territory Australia[J].Landscape Ecology,2010,25:1169-1183 DOI:10.1007/s10980-010-9498-6.
[13] 华伟平,陈白璧,李宝银,等.福建山区乡村旅游地空间分异及其影响因素研究[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,35(5):98-105.DOI:10.12046/j.issn.1000-5277.2019.05.015.
[14] 杨秀成,宋立中,王倩.中国乡村旅游创客基地时空分异及可持续发展机制研究[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,37(3):106-116.DOI:10.12046/j.issn.1000-5277.2021.03.014.
[15] 李遥,骆培聪,李瑞莹.基于地理标记照片的厦漳泉地区游客空间分布特征研究[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,36(2):93-100.DOI:10.12046/j.issn.1000-5277.2020.02.012.
[16] 苏志明.梧林传统古村落的特色建筑[J].建筑,2018(17):42-43.
[17] 程惠珊,尤达,刘群阅,等.嵩口古镇小气候与游览路径空间特征之关系研究[J].中国园林,2020,36(6):83-88.DOI:10.19775/j.cla.2020.06.0083.
[18] 李宇奇,罗奕爽,黎燕琼,等.基于AHP法的乡村景观质量评价体系构建: 以川西林盘为例[J].西北林学院学报,2018,33(2):263-268.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.02.43.
[19] QI Wei,LI Mimi,XIAO Honggen,et al.Study on the influence of tourists’ value on sustainable development of Huizhou traditional villages: A case of Hongcun and Xidi[C]//3rd International Conference on Energy Resources and Sustainable Development.[S.l.]:EDP Sciences,2021:03007.DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/202123603007.
[20] BROWN G,KYTT? M.Key issues and research priorities in public participation GIS(PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research[J].Applied Geography,2014,46:1-12.DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004.
[21] 孟世玉,杨芳绒,李卓,等.广西乡村景观村民满意度评价及障碍因子分析: 以北流市北部乡村为例[J].中国园林,2022,38(9):87-92.DOI:10.19775/j.cla.2022.09.0087.
[22] 黄莹莹,谈石柱,陈倩婷,等.基于景观特征识别和评价的乡村景观营造模式[J].浙江农林大学学报,2022,39(4):894-901.DOI:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20210644.
[23] 孙漪南,赵芯,王宇泓,等.基于VR全景图技术的乡村景观视觉评价偏好研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(12):104-112.DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20160261.
[24] 张茜,刘文平,宇振荣.乡村景观特征评价方法: 以长沙市乔口镇为例[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(5):1537-1547.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.20150302.016.
[25] 李丽凤,蔡双娇,刘文爱,等.基于灰色统计分析的北海市红树林景观美景度评价与估算[J].湿地科学,2020,18(3):313-319.DOI:10.13248/j.cnki.wetlandsci.2020.03.007.
[26] 邓聚龙.灰理论基础[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2002.
[27] 梁新宇,罗晨,权冀川,等.基于深度学习的图像语义分割技术研究进展[J].计算机工程与应用,2020,56(2):18-28.DOI:10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.1910-0300.
[28] SUN Ke,ZHAO Yang,JIANG Borui,et al.High-resolution representations for labeling pixels and regions[EB/OL].(2019-04-09)[2023-09-19] .https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.04514.
[29] ZHOU Bolei,ZHAO Hang,PUIG X,et al.Semantic understanding of scenes through the ADE20K dataset[J].International Journal of Computer Vision,2019,127:302-321.DOI:10.1007/s11263-018-1140-0.
[30] 李小江,蔡洋,卡洛·拉蒂.基于街道图像与深度学习的城市景观研究[J].景观设计学,2018,6(2):20-29.
[31] 周潇夫.园林工程项目质量评价体系研究 [D].杭州:浙江理工大学,2021.
[32] FRANK S,FUERST C,KOSCHKE L,et al.Assessment of landscape aesthetics-validation of a landscape metrics-based assessment by visual estimation of the scenic beauty[J].Ecological Indicators,2013,32:222-231.DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.026.
[33] 李哲,宋爽,何钰昆.基于美景度评价法(SBE)的当代新中式景园材质建构研究[J].中国园林,2018,34(11):107-112.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2018.11.022.
[34] 周阳超,王瑞辉,周璞,等.基于SBE法的湖南大围山白檀林春季景观质量评价[J].西北林学院学报,2019,34(2):257-262.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2019.02.39.
[35] YIN Guojun,SHENG Lu,LIU Bin,et al.Zoom-Net: Mining deep feature interactions for visual relationship recognition[EB/OL].(2018-07-13)[2023-09-19] .https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.04979.
[36] 毕芳菲,刘加平,蔺宝钢.基于景观视觉吸引的文旅空间建设策略研究: 以关中历史文化街区为例[J].中国园林,2023,39(2):84-89.DOI:10.19775/j.cla.2023.02.0084.
[37] 魏晖,李婷婷,张蒙静,等.秦皇岛海滨公园风景林景观质量评价与影响因素分析[J].西部林业科学,2022,51(3):145-151.DOI:10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2022.03.020.
[38] 朱晓玥,张华荣,兰思仁,等.基于量化分析和公众感知的传统村落色彩景观优化研究: 以闽南蟳埔村为例[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,54(1):50-59.DOI:10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2020.01.009.
[39] 余侃华,张文婷,任怡康,等.黄土台塬区农村道路生态化模式建构及设计应对探究: 以宝鸡市金台区北坡路域生态整治为例[J].中国园林,2022,38(6):45-50.DOI:10.19775/j.cla.2022.06.0045.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2023-09-28
通信作者: 丁铮(1968-),男,教授,主要从事景观规划与设计的研究。E-mail:dz0591@126.com。
基金项目: 中国农林高校设计艺术联盟专项资助项目(111900050)https://hdxb.hqu.edu.cn/
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-05-20