[1]吴常蕊,王宏卫,罗魁,等.伊犁河谷“三生”空间景观生态风险时空演变与多情景模拟[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2024,45(1):61-70.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202310024]
　WU Changrui,WANG Hongwei,LUO Kui,et al.Spatiotemporal Evolution and Multi Scenario Simulation of Ecological Risks in “Three Lives” Spatial Landscape of Ili River Valley[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2024,45(1):61-70.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202310024]
点击复制

伊犁河谷“三生”空间景观生态风险时空演变与多情景模拟()
分享到：

《华侨大学学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1000-5013/CN:35-1079/N]

卷:
第45卷
期数:
2024年第1期
页码:
61-70
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-01-11

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatiotemporal Evolution and Multi Scenario Simulation of Ecological Risks in “Three Lives” Spatial Landscape of Ili River Valley
文章编号:
1000-5013(2024)01-0061-10
作者:
吴常蕊1; 2;  王宏卫1; 2;  罗魁1; 2;  郑旭东1; 2;  闫晓梅1; 2
1. 新疆大学 地理科学与遥感学院, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046;2. 新疆大学 新疆绿洲生态自治区重点实验室, 新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046
Author(s):
WU Changrui1; 2;  WANG Hongwei1; 2;  LUO Kui1; 2; ZHENG Xudong1; 2;  YAN Xiaomei1; 2
1. School of Geographic Science and Remote Sensing, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China2. Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Oasis Ecological Autonomous Region, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
关键词:
“三生”空间;  景观生态风险;  PLUS模型: 模拟预测;  伊犁河谷
Keywords:
“three lives” space;  landscape ecological risk;  PLUS model;  simulation prediction;  Ili River Valley
分类号:
P901;X826
DOI:
10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202310024
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于伊犁河谷1990-2020年土地利用数据,利用景观生态风险评价模型探析“生产-生活-生态”(“三生”)空间及景观生态风险格局时空演变特征,借助PLUS模型模拟伊犁河谷2030年生产空间优先、生活空间优先和生态空间优先3种情景下“三生”空间格局及景观生态风险分布特征。结果表明:1990-2020年,伊犁河谷“三生”空间以草地生态空间为主,草地生态空间和林地生态空间面积呈减少趋势,其余空间呈增加趋势;1990,2000,2010,2020年景观生态风险均值分别为0.035 5,0.033 1,0.034 8,0.034 6,伊犁河谷景观生态风险呈先下降后上升趋势,风险等级在空间分布上呈现梯度变化;2020-2030年3种情景的景观生态风险均呈上升趋势,景观生态风险均值从大到小为生活空间优先情景、生态空间优先情景、生产空间优先情景。
Abstract:
Based on the land-use data of the Ili River Valley from 1990 to 2020, the landscape ecological risk assessment model was used to explore the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of the “production-living-ecological”(“three lives”)spaces and landscape ecological risk patterns. The PLUS model was used to simulate the spatial patterns and the landscape ecological risk distribution characteristics of “three lives” under the three scenarios including the production space priority, the living space priority and the ecological space priority of the Ili River Valley in 2030. The results showed that, from 1990 to 2020, “three lives” spaces of Ili River Valley was dominated by the grassland ecological space, and the area of grassland ecological space and woodland ecological space showed a decreasing trend, while the remaining space showed an increasing trend. In 1990, 2000,2010 and 2020, the average landscape ecological risks were 0.035 5, 0.033 1, 0.034 8 and 0.034 6, respectively. The landscape ecological risks of the Ili River Valley showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing, and the risk levels showed a gradient change in spatial distribution. From 2020 to 2030, the landscape ecological risks showed an upward trend under the three scenarios, and the average value of landscape ecological risks which ranged from high to low were the living space, the ecological space, and the production space of priority scenarios.

参考文献/References:

[1] TIAN Peng,LI Jialin,GONG Hongbo,et al.Research on land use changes and ecological risk assessment in Yongjiang River Basin in Zhejiang Province, China[J].Sustainability,2019,11(10):2817.DOI:10.3390/su11102817.
[2] PENG Jian,ZONG Minli,HU Yina,et al.Assessinglandscape ecological risk in a mining city: A case study in Liaoyuan City, China[J].Sustainability,2015,7(7):8312-8334.DOI:10.3390/su7078312.
[3] CUI Lu,ZHAO Yonghua,LIU Jianchao,et al.Landscape ecological risk assessment in Qinling Mountain[J].Geological Journal,2018,53:342-351.DOI:10.1002/gj.3115.
[4] CHEN Gong,LI Qi,PENG Fei,et al.Henanecological security evaluation using improved 3D ecological footprint model based on emergy and net primary productivity[J].Sustainability,2019,11(5):1353.DOI:10.3390/su11051353.
[5] YAN Yichen,JU Hongrun,ZHANG Shengrui,et al.The construction of ecological security patterns in coastal areas based on landscape ecological risk assessment: A case study of Jiaodong Peninsula, China[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2021,18(22):12249.DOI:10.3390/ijerph182212249.
[6] LIU Di,CHEN Hai,ZHAN Hang,et al.Spatiotemporal evolution of landscape ecological risk based on geomorphological regionalization during 1980-2017: A case study of Shaanxi Province, China[J].Sustainability,2020,12(3):941.DOI:10.3390/su12030941.
[7] YANG Yang,SPYROU B,WHITE J M,et al.Palladium-mediated CO2 extrusion followed by insertion of allene: Translating mechanistic studies to develop a one-pot method for the synthesis of alkenes[J].Organometallics,2020,39(3):453-467.
[8] 王洁,摆万奇,田国行.土地利用生态风险评价研究进展[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(3):576-585.DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200306.
[9] 高星,刘泽伟,李晨曦,等.基于“三生空间”的雄安新区土地利用功能转型与生态环境效应研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(20):7113-7122.DOI:10.5846/stxb202002240325.
[10] 陈慧敏,周冬梅,张军,等.基于景观格局的渭河流域甘肃段生态风险评价[J].农业工程,2022,12(11):72-79.
[11] 刘可暄,王冬梅,魏源送,等.密云水库流域多尺度景观生态风险时空演变趋势[J].生态学报,2023,43(1):105-117.
[12] 修炀景,侯蒙京,田骄阳,等.基于土地利用/覆盖的甘肃省景观生态风险时空变化特征[J].草业学报,2023,32(1):1-15.DOI:10.11686/cyxb2021298.
[13] 翟培秀,李飞雪,邱小倩,等.长三角地区景观生态风险时空演变评估[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(4):245-255.
[14] 王玲,汪淼.成渝城市群景观生态风险演变分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2023,32(3):626-637.
[15] 杨庚.景观格局演变背景下晋北大型露天矿区生态系统弹性与风险评价[D].北京:中国地质大学,2021.
[16] 乔斌,曹晓云,孙玮婕,等.基于生态系统服务价值和景观生态风险的生态分区识别与优化策略: 以祁连山国家公园青海片区为例[J].生态学报,2023,43(3):986-1004.
[17] 陈心怡,谢跟踪,张金萍.海口市海岸带近30年土地利用变化的景观生态风险评价[J].生态学报,2021,41(3):975-986.DOI:10.5846/stxb201909211974.
[18] CHEN Jian,DONG Bin,LI Haoran,et al.Study on landscape ecological risk assessment of hooded crane breeding and overwintering habitat[J].Environmental Research,2020,187(4):109649.DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109649.
[19] 何钊全,尚雪,张铜会,等.近20年陕北黄土丘陵区景观生态风险时空变化及其冷热点格局[J].生态学杂志,2023,42(10):2514-2525.DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.202310.007.
[20] 王敏,胡守庚,张绪冰,等.干旱区绿洲城镇景观生态风险时空变化分析: 以张掖绿洲乡镇为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(14):5812-5824.DOI:10.5846/stxb202105111234.
[21] 袁雪松,周俊,胡蓓蓓,等.基于FLUS模型粤港澳大湾区“三生空间”多情景模拟预测[J].地理科学,2023,43(3):564-574.DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2023.03.018.
[22] 赵霁雨,崔柳,王佳,等.基于土地利用模拟预测模型分析的城市绿色空间发展多情景模拟及建设时序研究: 以湛江市中心城区为例[J].生态学报,2023,43(15):6307-6320.
[23] 康紫薇,张正勇,位宏,等.基于土地利用变化的玛纳斯河流域景观生态风险评价[J].生态学报,2020,40(18):6472-6485.DOI:10.5846/stxb201908191731.
[24] 樊影,王宏卫,杨胜天,等.基于生境质量和生态安全格局的阿勒泰地区生态保护关键区域识别[J].生态学报,2021,41(19):7614-7626.DOI:10.5846/stxb202011202987.
[25] 杨清可,段学军,王磊等.基于“三生空间”的土地利用转型与生态环境效应: 以长江三角洲核心区为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(1):97-106.DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.01.011.
[26] LIU Shishi,SU Hang,CAO Guofeng,et al.Learning from data: A post classification method for annual land cover analysis in urban areas[J].ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,2019,154(8):202-215.DOI:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.06.006.
[27] YAO Yao,LIU Xiaoping,LI Xia,et al.Simulating urban land-use changes at a large scale by integrating dynamic land parcel subdivision and vector-based cellular automata[J].International Journal of Geographical Information Science,2017,31(12):2452-2479.DOI:10.1080/13658816.2017.1360494.
[28] 王子尧,黄楚梨,李倞,等.耦合InVEST-HFI-PLUS模型的生态分区规划与动态评估: 以博尔塔拉蒙古自治州为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(14):5789-5798.DOI:10.5846/stxb202108202319.
[29] 靳甜甜,张云霞,朱月华,等.黄土高原林区生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险时空变化及其关联性: 以子午岭区为例[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(5):1623-1632.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.030.
[30] 高宾,李小玉,李志刚,等.基于景观格局的锦州湾沿海经济开发区生态风险分析[J].生态学报,2011,31(12):3441-3450.
[31] PENG Jian,WANG Yanglin,ZHANG Yuan,et al.Evaluating the effectiveness of landscape metrics in quantifying spatial patterns[J].Ecological Indicators,2010,10(2):217-223.
[32] 吕乐婷,张杰,孙才志,等.基于土地利用变化的细河流域景观生态风险评估[J].生态学报,2018,38(16):5952-5960.
[33] 邱彭华,徐颂军,谢跟踪,等.基于景观格局和生态敏感性的海南西部地区生态脆弱性分析[J].生态学报,2007(4):1257-1264.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.04.001.
[34] 孙才志,闫晓露,钟敬秋.下辽河平原景观格局脆弱性及空间关联格局[J].生态学报,2014,34(2):247-257.DOI:10.5846/stxb201303200465.
[35] 孔冬艳,陈会广,吴孔森.中国“三生空间”演变特征、生态环境效应及其影响因素[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(5):1116-1135.DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20210503.
[36] 姜昕彤,翟石艳,王铮,等.基于未来土地利用模拟模型的郑州市“三生空间”模拟及生态环境效应分析[J].生态学报,2023,43(15):6225-6242.
[37] 柳梦琪.基于PLUS模型的老挝土地利用格局时空演变及模拟预测研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2022.
[38] 陈鸿基,杨庆媛,彭立娴,等.三峡库区县域“三生空间”时空演变特征与情景模拟[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(13):285-294.
[39] 苏迎庆,刘庚,赵景波,等.基于FLUS模型的汾河流域生态空间多情景模拟预测[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(4):1152-1161.
[40] 李万年,曹月娥,张婷婷.基于GIS的伊犁河谷2000-2010年土地利用的动态变化[J].湖北农业科学,2017,56(20):3853-3858.DOI:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2017.20.016.
[41] 贺可,吴世新,杨怡,等.近40 a新疆土地利用及其绿洲动态变化[J].干旱区地理,2018,41(6):1333-1340.
[42] 谈旭,王承武.伊犁河谷生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(10):2747-2756.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202310.021.
[43] 郑艺文,刘晓煌,熊茂秋,等.1990-2018年新疆“三生”用地时空变化特征及其碳排放效应[J].草业科学,2022,39(12):2565-2577.
[44] LIANG Xun,GUAN Qingfeng,CLARKE K C,et al.Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation(PLUS)model: A case study in Wuhan, China[J].Computers Environment and Urban Systems,2021,85:101569.DOI:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101569.
[45] 牛统莉,熊立华,陈杰,等.基于PLUS模型的长江流域土地利用变化模拟与多情景预测[J].生态学报,2022,42(10):3947-3958.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2023-10-02
通信作者: 王宏卫(1967-),男,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事干旱区生态环境与城乡发展的研究。E-mail:wanghw_777@163.com。
基金项目: 新疆第三次综合科学考察资助项目(2021xjkk0902)https://hdxb.hqu.edu.cn/
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-01-20