[1]陈岩君,欧达毅,廉英奇,等.南音声景的感知评价与心理恢复性效应[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2023,44(6):702-706.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202309009]
 CHEN Yanjun,OU Dayi,LIAN Yinqi,et al.Perception Evaluation and Psychological Restorative Effect of Nanyin Soundscape[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2023,44(6):702-706.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202309009]
点击复制

南音声景的感知评价与心理恢复性效应()
分享到:

《华侨大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-5013/CN:35-1079/N]

卷:
第44卷
期数:
2023年第6期
页码:
702-706
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Perception Evaluation and Psychological Restorative Effect of Nanyin Soundscape
文章编号:
1000-5013(2023)06-0702-05
作者:
陈岩君1 欧达毅12 廉英奇1 杜春雨1 徐涵1
1. 华侨大学 建筑学院, 福建 厦门 361021;2. 华侨大学 福建省城乡建筑遗产保护技术重点实验室, 福建 厦门 361021
Author(s):
CHEN Yanjun1 OU Dayi12 LIAN Yinqi1 DU Chunyu1 XU Han1
1. School of Architecture, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China; 2. Urban and Rural Architectural Heritage Protection Technology Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China
关键词:
声景 声景感知 南音 恢复性 自上而下加工
Keywords:
soundscape soundscape perception Nanyin restorative top-down processing
分类号:
TU112
DOI:
10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202309009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了传承与保护入选世界级非物质文化遗产的南音,探究南音声景的感知评价和心理恢复性效应,以南音器乐曲《梅花操》为研究对象,在实验室环境下,使用语义差异评价问卷和声景感知恢复量表(PRSS)探究南音声景的感知评价和心理恢复性效应,并借助一段南音介绍视频考虑自上而下加工对声景感知的影响。结果表明:声景感知评价中舒适性的评分均值为2.00,说明南音舒适性较好;PRSS的评分均值为4.73,说明南音具有一定的恢复作用;观看介绍视频会让被试对南音需要传承与保护更加认同;南音是一种具有恢复性的声景,自上而下加工对声景感知有一定影响。
Abstract:
In order to inherit and protect the Nanyin as a world-class intangible cultural heritage, and to investigate the perception evaluation and psychological restorative effect of Nanyin soundscape, taking the Nanyin instrumental music Mei Hua Cao as the research object, the semantic differential evaluation questionnaire and the perceived restorativeness soundscape scale(PRSS)are used to explore the perception evaluation and psychological restorative effect of Nanyin soundscape in the laboratory environment. The effect of the top-down processing on the soundscape perception is considered with the help of the introductory video of Nanyin. The results show that the mean score value of comfort in the soundscape perception evaluation is 2.00, indicating better comfort of Nanyin. The mean score value of the PRSS is 4.73, indicating certain restorative effect of Nanyin. Watching the introduction video will make the subjects more agreeable to the need for inheritance and protection of Nanyin. Nanyin is a soundscape with restoration, and top-down processing has a certain effect on soundscape perception.

参考文献/References:

[1] 彭兆荣,葛荣玲.南音与文化空间[J].民族艺术,2007(4):64-69.DOI:10.16564/j.cnki.1003-2568.2007.04.005.
[2] 陈敏红.乐人、曲谱及文化空间的“原真”保护: 泉州南音民间乐社传承困境研究[J].渭南师范学院学报,2015,30(5):87-89,96.DOI:10.15924/j.cnki.1009-5128.2015.05.016.
[3] 吴婉嫔.论泉州南音传承与教学的现状[D].南昌:南昌大学,2022.DOI:10.27232/d.cnki.gnchu.2022.004411.
[4] 王媛媛.泉州南音洞箫的民间传承研究[D].泉州:泉州师范学院,2022.DOI:10.27882/d.cnki.gqzsf.2022.000063.
[5] 白志艺,章咏杰.基于互联网技术的南音传承新模式探究[J].泉州师范学院学报,2021,39(5):73-77.DOI:10.16125/j.cnki.1009-8224.2021.05.014.
[6] 陈恩慧.泉州师范学院南音本科专业教学改革探究[J].中国音乐,2021(3):114-119.DOI:10.13812/j.cnki.cn11-1379/j.2021.03.013.
[7] INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION FOR STANDARDIZATION.ISO 12913-1: Acoustics-soundscape-part 1: Definitionand conceptual framework[S].Geneva: International Organisation for Standardization,2014.
[8] 张圆.城市公共开放空间声景的恢复性效应研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2016.
[9] UEBEL K,MARSELLE M,DEAN A J,et al.Urban green space soundscapes and their perceived restorativeness[J].People and Nature,2021,3(3):756-769.DOI:10.1002/pan3.10215.
[10] DOUGLAS J W A,EVANS K L.An experimental test of the impact of avian diversity on attentional benefits and enjoyment of people experiencing urban green-space[J].People and Nature,2022,4(1):243-259.DOI:10.1002/pan3.10279.
[11] YANG W Y,MOON H J.Effects of indoor water sounds on intrusive noise perception and speech recognition in rooms[J].Building Services Engineering Research and Technology,2018,39(6):637-651.DOI:10.1177/01436244 18769187.
[12] TRUDEAU C,STEELE D,GUASTAVINO C.A tale of three misters: The effect of water features on soundscape assessments in a montreal public space[J].Frontiers in Psychology,2020,11:570797.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570797.
[13] DENG Li,LUO Hao,MA Jun,et al.Effects of integration between visual stimuli and auditory stimuli on restorative potential and aesthetic preference in urban green spaces[J].Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2020,53:126702.DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126702.
[14] LIU Fangfang,LIU Peiye,KANG Jian,et al.Relationships between landscape characteristics and the restorative quality of soundscapes in urban blue spaces[J].Applied Acoustics,2022,189:108600.DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108600.
[15] RATCLIFFE E.Sound and soundscape in restorative natural environments: A narrative literature review[J].Frontiers in Psychology,2021,12:570563.DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.570563.
[16] 廉英奇,欧达毅,潘森森,等.不同景观空间类型的声景评价研究[J].建筑科学,2020,36(8):57-63.DOI:10.13614/j.cnki.11-1962/tu.2020.08.09.
[17] PAYNE R S.The production of a perceived restorativeness soundscape scale[J].Applied Acoustics,2013,74(2):255-263.DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.11.005.
[18] KAPLAN S.The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,1995,15(3):169-182.DOI:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2.
[19] ZHAO Wei,LI Hongyu,ZHU Xun,et al.Effect of birdsong soundscape on perceived restorativeness in an urban park[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2020,17(16):5659.DOI:10.3390/ijerph17165659.
[20] 李亨.山地城市公园声景特征及健康效益研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2020.DOI:10.27670/d.cnki.gcqdu.2020.000430.
[21] MICHELS N,HAMERS P.Nature sounds for stress recovery and healthy eating: A lab experiment differentiating water and bird sound[J].Environment and Behavior,2023,55(3):175-205.DOI:10.1177/00139165231174622.
[22] 艾祥睿,欧达毅.声压级大小对鸟叫声和流水声恢复性效应的影响[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2022,43(5):612-618.DOI:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202104054.
[23] 梁凤华,苏前忠.大学生音乐欣赏偏好与大五人格特征相关的研究[J].上饶师范学院学报,2016,36(5):100-106.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2237.2016.05.019.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2023-09-09
通信作者: 欧达毅(1982-),男,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事建筑声环境、声景观的研究。E-mail:oudayi_hqu@126.com。
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51578252); 福建省社会科学规划项目(FJ2021B075, FJ2017C018)
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-11-20