[1]陈星欣,何明高,房敏安,等.径向围压条件下的砂粒流失特性试验[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2022,43(4):440-447.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202111037]
　CHEN Xingxin,HE Minggao,FANG Minan,et al.Experiment on Sand Loss Characteristic Under Radial Confining Pressure Condition[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2022,43(4):440-447.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202111037]
点击复制

径向围压条件下的砂粒流失特性试验()
分享到：

《华侨大学学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1000-5013/CN:35-1079/N]

卷:
第43卷
期数:
2022年第4期
页码:
440-447
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-07-18

文章信息/Info

Title:
Experiment on Sand Loss Characteristic Under Radial Confining Pressure Condition
文章编号:
1000-5013(2022)04-0440-08
作者:
陈星欣1;  何明高1;  房敏安1;  郭力群1;  尹清锋2;  白冰3
1. 华侨大学 土木工程学院, 福建 厦门 361021; 2. 中建交通建设集团有限公司, 北京 100142;3. 北京交通大学 土木建筑工程学院, 北京 100044
Author(s):
CHEN Xingxin1;  HE Minggao1;  FANG Min’an1; GUO Liqun1;  YIN Qingfeng2;  BAI Bing3
1.College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China; 2.China Construction Communications Construction Group Limited Company, Beijing 100142, China; 3.School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
关键词:
砂粒流失;  三轴试验;  渗透性;  岩土力学;  压实系数
Keywords:
sand loss;  triaxial test;  permeability characteristic;  geomechanics;  compaction coefficient
分类号:
TU441.3;TU411
DOI:
10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202111037
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对径向围压条件下砂粒流失问题,通过自行研制的三轴砂粒流失试验装置,研究压实系数、水力梯度和破损口直径对砂粒流失机理和渗透性演化规律的影响.试验结果表明:在不同压实系数、水力梯度和破损口直径条件下,砂粒流失均可分为无流失阶段、快速流失阶段及稳定流失阶段;在高压实系数条件下,流水体积均可分为缓慢发展阶段与快速发展阶段,并且存在短暂堵塞阶段,而在低压实系数条件下,流水体积基本不存在缓慢发展阶段和短暂堵塞阶段;砂粒累计流失率基本上随压实系数的增大而减小,随水力梯度的增大而增大,但随着破损口直径增大,压实系数对砂粒流失的影响减小,同时,随着压实系数增大,水力梯度对砂粒累计流失率的影响减小.
Abstract:
Aiming at the problem of sand loss under radial confining pressure condition, through the self-developed triaxial sand loss test device, the effects of compaction coefficient, hydraulic gradient and diameter of damaged orifice on sand loss mechanism and permeability evolution law were studied. The test results show that the sand loss can be divided into no loss stage, rapid loss stage and stable loss stage under different conditions of compaction coefficient, hydraulic gradient and diameter of damage orifice. Under the condition of high compaction coefficient, flow volume can be divided into slow development stage and fast development stage, and there is a transient plugging stage. Under the condition of the low compaction coefficient, there is no slow development stage and no transient plugging stage in flowing water volume. The cumulative sand loss rate basically decreases with the increase of compaction coefficient, increases with the increase of hydraulic gradient. With the increase of diameter of damaged orifice, the influence of compaction coefficient on cumulative sand loss rate decreases. With the increase of compaction coefficient, the influence of hydraulic gradient on cumula-tive sand loss decreases.

参考文献/References:

[1] NI J C,CHENG W C.Characterising the failure pattern of a station box of Taipei Rapid Transit System(TRTS)and its rehabilitation[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2012,32:260-272.DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2012.06.010.
[2] 刘成禹,陈博文,罗洪林,等.满流条件下管道破损诱发渗流侵蚀的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2020,41(1):1-10.DOI:10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1852.
[3] 李涛,张子真,宗露丹,等.地下空洞引起土质地层地陷的形成机制与预测研究[J].岩土力学,2015,36(7):1995-2002.DOI:10.16285/j.rsm.2015.07.022.
[4] 李曙光,方理刚.土压平衡盾构在富水饱和粉细砂层中掘进事故实测分析[J].铁道建筑,2005(12):35-37.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2005.12.014.
[5] 何振宁.铁路隧道疑难工程地质问题分析: 以30多座典型隧道工程为例[J].隧道建设,2016,36(6):636-665.DOI:10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2016.06.002.
[6] 任广艳.透水涌砂冒险堵漏隧道坍塌撤人不及: 广东省佛山市轨道交通2号线“2.7”透水坍塌重大事故分析[J].吉林劳动保护,2019(8):3.
[7] 付宏渊,吴胜军,王桂尧.荷载作用引起砂土渗透性变化的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2009,30(12):3677-3681.DOI:10.16285/j.rsm.2009.12.019.
[8] 汤爱平,董莹,谭周地,等.振动作用下矿井突水涌砂机理的研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,1999,19(2):132-135.DOI:10.13197/j.eeev.1999.02.021.
[9] ROCCHIM A,MAROT D,SIBILLE L,et al.Effects of hydraulic loading history on suffusion susceptibility of cohesionless soils[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2017,143(7):04017025.DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001673.
[10] 袁涛,蒋中明,刘德谦,等.粗粒土渗透损伤特性试验研究[J].岩土力学,2018,39(4):1311-1316.DOI:10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0981.
[11] 张敏江,张丽萍,姜秀萍,等.弱胶结砂层突涌机理及预测研究[J].金属矿山,2002(10):48-50.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1250.2002.10.016.
[12] BENDAHMANE F,MAROT D,ALEXIS A.Experimental parametric study of suffusion and backward erosion[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2008,134(1):57-67.DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:1(57).
[13] 郑刚,戴轩,张晓双.地下工程漏水漏砂灾害发展过程的试验研究及数值模拟[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(12):2458-2471.DOI:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.12.011.
[14] 田大浪,谢强,宁越,等.间断级配砂砾石土的渗透变形试验研究[J].岩土力学,2020,41(11):3663-3670.DOI:10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0253.
[15] 张冬梅,杜伟伟,高程鹏.间断级配砂土中管线破损引起的渗流侵蚀模型试验[J].岩土工程学报,2018,40(11):2129-2135.DOI:10.11779/CJGE201811020.
[16] 隋旺华,蔡光桃,董青红.近松散层采煤覆岩采动裂缝水砂突涌临界水力坡度试验[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(10):2084-2091.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.10.018.
[17] 刘成禹,张翔,程凯,等.地下工程涌水涌砂诱发的沉降试验研究[J].岩土力学,2019,40(3):843-851.DOI:10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1742.
[18] 杨伟峰,吉育兵,赵国荣,等.厚松散层薄基岩采动诱发水砂流运移特征试验[J].岩土工程学报,2012,34(4):686-692.DOI:10.1007/s11783-011-0280-z.
[19] GUO Shuai,SHAO Yu,ZHANG Tuqiao,et al.Physical modeling on sand erosion around defective sewer pipes under the influence of groundwater[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2013,139(12):1247-1257.DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000785.
[20] CHEN Xingxin,FANG Minan,LI Biao,et al.Experimental study on seepage-induced concentrated leak erosion in sand under triaxial testing conditions[J].Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2021,15(1):1-12.DOI:10.1007/s12517-021-09271-w.
[21] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.土工试验方法标准: GB/T 50123-2019[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2019.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2021-11-06
通信作者: 陈星欣(1984-),男,教授,博士,主要从事城市地下空间工程的研究.E-mail:chenxx@hqu.edu.cn.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51308235, 51908151)http://www.hdxb.hqu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-20