[1]刘伊衔,曾志兴,余文茂.不同轴压比装配式RC圆柱抗震性能分析[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2022,43(2):183-191.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202108007]
 LIU Yixian,ZENG Zhixing,YU Wenmao.Analysis on Seismic Performance of Prefabricated RC Column With Different Axial Compression Ratios[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2022,43(2):183-191.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202108007]
点击复制

不同轴压比装配式RC圆柱抗震性能分析()
分享到:

《华侨大学学报(自然科学版)》[ISSN:1000-5013/CN:35-1079/N]

卷:
第43卷
期数:
2022年第2期
页码:
183-191
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-03-08

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on Seismic Performance of Prefabricated RC Column With Different Axial Compression Ratios
文章编号:
1000-5013(2022)02-0183-09
作者:
刘伊衔 曾志兴 余文茂
华侨大学 土木工程学院, 福建 厦门 361021
Author(s):
LIU Yixian ZENG Zhixing YU Wenmao
College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361012, China
关键词:
钢筋混凝土圆柱 装配式 抗震性能 数值分析 轴压比
Keywords:
reinforced concrete circular column prefabricated seismic performance numerical analysis axial compression ratio
分类号:
TU375
DOI:
10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202108007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究轴压比对装配式全灌浆套筒连接高强混凝土圆柱抗震性能的影响,采用有限元软件ABAQUS建立装配式钢筋混凝土(RC)圆柱的数值分析模型,并进行验证.在试验参数的基础上,扩大数值模型轴压比的取值范围,研究轴压比对装配式RC圆柱的承载能力、刚度退化及延性性能等抗震性能指标的影响规律.结果表明:模拟得到的破坏形态、骨架曲线与试验结果基本吻合,且精度较高;当轴压比由0.20增至0.90时,试件的屈服荷载、峰值荷载均随轴压比增大而增大,延性性能反而降低,试件的极限位移由67.50 mm减少至31.76 mm,降低约53%;当轴压比大于0.90时,试件的承载能力、延性性能均随轴压比的增加而降低.因此,轴压比对装配式RC圆柱抗震性能的影响较大,在较高轴压比下,装配式RC圆柱仍具有较好的抗震性能.
Abstract:
In order to study the influence of axial compression ratio on the seismic performance of prefabricated full-grouted sleeve-connected reinforced concrete(RC)circular column, the finite element software ABAQUS was used to establish the numerical analysis model of the prefabricated RC circular column and to verify. On the basis of the test parameters, the value range of the numerical model axial compression ratio was extended, and the influence of the axial compression ratio on the bearing capacity, stiffness degradation and ductility performance of the prefabricated RC circular column was studied. The results show that, the damage shapes and skeleton curves obtained by the simulation are basically consistent with the test results with high accuracy. When the axial compression ratio increases from 0.20 to 0.90, the yield load and peak load of the specimen increase, conversely the ductility performance decreases, and the ultimate displacement of the specimen decreases from 67.50 mm to 31.76 mm by about 53%. When the axial compression ratio is greater than 0.90, the bearing capacity and ductility performance of the specimen decreases with the increase of axial compression ratio. Therefore, the axial compression ratio greatly influences on the seismic ability of the prefabricated RC circular column, and the prefabricated RC circular column still has good seismic performance with high axial compression ratio.

参考文献/References:

[1] 赵勇,李锐,王晓锋,等.大直径高强钢筋套筒灌浆连接预制柱抗震性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2017,50(5):27-35,71.DOI:10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2017.05.004.
[2] HAN Qiang,LI Xiaopeng,XU Kun,et al.Shear strength and cracking mechanism of precast bridge columns with grouted sleeve connections[J].Engineering Structures,2021,230(1):100-115.DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111616.
[3] 史亚娟,李升才.往复水平荷载下不同梁截面RCS空间组合件变形性能分析[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2021,42(1):38-47.DOI:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202003036.
[4] 乔德浩,王少杰,庞加宝,等.倒置外露灌浆套筒连接的不同轴压比柱脚节点抗震性能试验研究[J].世界地震工程,2021,37(1):122-128.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-6069.2021.01.014.
[5] XIAO Jianzhuang,ZHANG C.Seismic behavior of RC columns with circular, square and diamond sections[J].Construction and Building Materials,2008,22(5):801-810.DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.01.010.
[6] 李晟,庄海洋,王伟,等.采用不同中柱的单层地铁地下车站结构抗震性能对比研究[J].岩土工程学报,2021,43(10):1905-1914.DOI:10.11779/CJGE202110017.
[7] WANG Bin,LIANG Jianghao,LU Zheng.Experimental investigation on seismic behavior of square CFT columns with different shear stud layout[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2019,153:130-138.DOI:10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.10.004.
[8] 甘丹,周绪红,刘界鹏,等.圆钢管约束钢筋混凝土短柱往复荷载作用下的组合效应[J].建筑结构学报,2015,36(增刊1):222-229.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2015.S1.034.
[9] 唐和生,凌塑奇,王霓.考虑灌浆缺陷的装配式混凝土柱抗震性能数值模拟[J].建筑结构,2018,48(23):33-37.DOI:10.19701/j.jzjg.2018.23.007.
[10] 余文茂.灌浆套筒连接装配式混凝土圆柱抗震性能试验研究[D].厦门:华侨大学,2019.
[11] MANDER J B,PRIESTLEY M J N,PARK R.Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1988,114(8):1804-1826.DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
[12] 方自虎,简旭阳,周尧,等.考虑屈曲的钢筋滞回模型[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2016,49(2):254-258.DOI:10.14188/j.1671-8844.2016-02-016.
[13] 陈建伟,王占文,鞠士龙,等.半灌浆套筒钢筋偏心连接受拉性能试验研究与数值模拟[J].建筑结构学报,2020,41(增刊2):160-171.DOI:10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.S2.0019.
[14] American Concrete Institute.Building code requirements for structural concrete(ACI 318-02)and commentary(ACI 318R-02)[S].Farmington Hills:American Concrete Institute,2002.
[15] 中国建筑科学研究院.建筑抗震设计规范: GB 50011-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
[16] 中国建筑科学研究院.混凝土结构设计规范: GB 50010-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
  

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2021-08-21
通信作者: 曾志兴(1967-),男,教授,博士,主要从事混凝土结构的研究.E-mail:zhixing@hqu.edu.cn.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51878302, 51778247)http://www.hdxb.hqu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-03-20