[1]周红,,䥺Symbol`@@,等.能值分析与碳足迹的建筑可持续性评价方法比较[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2021,42(4):494-500.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202012012]
　ZHOU Hong,SHEN Xiwen,SHEN Qiang,et al.Comparison of Building Sustainability Evaluation Methods Based on Emergy Analysis and Carbon Footprint[J].Journal of Huaqiao University(Natural Science),2021,42(4):494-500.[doi:10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202012012]
点击复制

能值分析与碳足迹的建筑可持续性评价方法比较()
分享到：

《华侨大学学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1000-5013/CN:35-1079/N]

卷:
第42卷
期数:
2021年第4期
页码:
494-500
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Building Sustainability Evaluation Methods Based on Emergy Analysis and Carbon Footprint
文章编号:
1000-5013(2021)04-0494-07
作者:
周红; 䥺Symbol`@@沈希文;  沈强;  舒婷
厦门大学 建筑与土木工程学院, 福建 厦门 361005
Author(s):
ZHOU Hong;  SHEN Xiwen;  SHEN Qiang;  SHU Ting
School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
关键词:
建筑可持续性;  能值分析;  碳足迹;  生态经济学;  评估方法
Keywords:
building sustainability;  emergy analysis;  carbon footprint;  ecological economics;  evaluation method
分类号:
TU201.5
DOI:
10.11830/ISSN.1000-5013.202012012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
对一个太阳能建筑案例“Sunny Inside”进行能值分析与碳足迹计算,分析二者结论的一致性与差异性.研究结果表明:在建筑全生命周期中,不可再生资源的能值投入和碳足迹分析结论一致,不可再生能值投入越多,产生的碳足迹也越多;能值分析将自然环境、社会和经济的可再生和不可再生资源都纳入考虑,侧重于从资源消耗的角度对建筑能耗进行计算,且可以直接评价建筑的可持续性;碳足迹方法则着眼于建筑的碳排放,用各个阶段、各种材料的CO2排放量表示建筑对温室效应的影响.
Abstract:
Energy analysis and carbon footprint were calculated for a solar building case “Sunny Inside”, to analyze the consistency and difference between their conclusions. The research results show that the energy input of non-renewable resources is consistent with the conclusion of carbon footprint in the whole building life cycle. The more the non-renewable energy input of building is, the more the carbon footprint is generated. Energy analysis takes into account renewable and non-renewable resources of natural environment, society and economy, focuses on calculating building energy consumption from the perspective of resource consumption, and can directly evaluate the sustainability of buildings. The carbon footprint method focuses on the carbon emissions of buildings, and uses the CO2 emissions of various stages and materials to show the impact of buildings on the greenhouse effect.

参考文献/References:

[1] 黄玲.中国建筑节能的现状及思考[J].建设科技,2008(16):74-75.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3915.2008.16.021.
[2] 张军学,王晨杨.基于能值法和碳排放法的建筑可持续性对比评估研究[J].城市建筑,2018(11):103-106.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-0232.2018.11.027.
[3] ODUM H T,ODUM E C,BROWN M T.Environment and society in Florida[M].Colorado:Lewis Publishers,1997.DOI:10.1201/9780203757222.
[4] ODUM H T.System ecology: An introduction[M].New York:Wiley,1983.DOI:10.2307/3899786.
[5] MEILLAUD F,GAY J B,BROWN M T.Evaluation of a building using the emergy method[J].Solar Energy,2005,79(2):204-212.DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2004.11.003.
[6] HOSSAINI N,HEWAGE K.Sustainable materials selection for canadian construction industry: An emergy-based life-cycle analysis(Em-LCA)of conventional and LEED suggested construction materials[J].Journal of Sustainable Development,2012,5(1):2-12.DOI:10.5539/jsd.v5n1p2.
[7] 张学军,彭昌海,王晨杨.基于能值方法评估高层办公建筑生态可持续性: 以东南大学逸夫建筑楼为例[J].华中建筑,2019,37(2):44-48.DOI:10.13942/j.cnki.hzjz.2019.02.011.
[8] REES W E.Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out[J].Environment and Urbanization,1992,4(2):121-130.DOI:10.1177/095624789200400212.
[9] 李飞,崔胜辉,高莉洁,等.砖混和剪力墙结构住宅建筑碳足迹对比研究[J].环境科学与技术,2012,35(6I):18-22.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2012.06I.005.
[10] 曾杰,颜伟国,赫赫,等.建筑材料碳足迹研究进展[J].材料导报,2013,27(增刊1):321-325.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-023X.2013.z1.090.
[11] 李水生,肖初华,杨建宇,等.建筑施工阶段碳足迹计算与分析研究[J].环境科学与管理,2020,45(3):41-45.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2020.03.009.
[12] ODUM H T,BROWN M T,BRANDT-WILLIAMS S L.Handbook of emergy evaluation folio 1: Introduction and global budget[M].Gainesville:University of Florida,2000.
[13] CAMPBELL D E.Emergy analysis of human carrying capacity and regional sustainability: An example using the state of Maine[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,1998,51(1):531-569.
[14] ODUM H T.Environmental accounting: EMERGY and environmental decision making[J].Forest Science,1997,43(2):305-306.DOI:10.1093/forestscience/43.2.305.
[15] ODUM H T.Environmental accounting: Emergy and environmental decision making[M].New York:Wiley,1996.DOI:10.5860/choice.34-0412.
[16] 李鹏飞.煤炭矿区复合生态系统能值分析[D].济南:山东师范大学,2014.
[17] 王红彦.基于生命周期评价的秸秆沼气集中供气工程能值分析[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2016.
[18] BROWN M T,BARDI E.Handbook of emergy evaluation: A compendium of data for emergy computation issued in a series of folios[M].Gainesville:Center for Environmental Policy,2001.
[19] AMOEDA R.Design for deconstruction: Emergy approach to evaluate deconstruction effectiveness[D].Portugal:Universidade do Minho,2009.
[20] 钱锋,王伟东.建筑环境效率能值分析与评价: 以北京大学体育馆为例[J].建筑学报,2007(7):39-42.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0529-1399.2007.07.011.
[21] HAUKOOS D S.Sustainable architecture and its relationship to industrialized building[D].Gainesville:University of Florida,1995.
[22] 李鹏,黄继华,莫延芬,等.昆明市四星级酒店住宿产品碳足迹计算与分析[J].旅游学刊,2010,25(3):27-34.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2010.03.009.
[23] 刘亮.基于LCA模型的工程项目碳足迹评估实证研究[D].赣州:江西理工大学,2011.
[24] 高源雪.建筑产品物化阶段碳足迹评价方法与实证研究[D].北京:清华大学,2012.
[25] 申娟娟.基于LCA的建筑碳足迹测算及减排对策研究[D].广州:广东工业大学,2019.
[26] 胡建星,郁亚娟,黄凯,等.3种先进新能源电池的足迹家族分析[J].工业安全与环保,2018,44(7):83-87.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-425X.2018.07.021.
[27] 朱文婷,韦保仁.苏州市生活垃圾处理碳足迹核查[J].环境科学研究,2011,24(7):828-834.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2020-12-04
通信作者: 周红(1973-),女,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事可持续建筑与建筑信息的研究.E-mail:mcwangzh@xmu.edu.cn.
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(G71271180); 福建省创新战略研究项目(2020R0002)
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-07-20